University of South Florida - click to return to home page
USFUSF
Links for Prospective StudentsLinks for Our StudentsLinks for VisitorsLinks for Faculty & StaffLinks for Alumni & ParentsLinks for Business & CommunityInformation About USF Campuses
    Emergency assistance after business hours, call 911 or the USF Police at (813) 974-2628
Diversity Issues Looking for button Phsychology Internship Program
psychological Services main Veteran Services main Academic Success main Employee Assistance Program EAP main About the Counseling Center main
CCHD - psychological services
 
Practitioner Scholar Model

The Counseling Center seeks Interns from APA accredited programs in clinical and counseling psychology which produce students with the skills necessary to think critically and to evaluate the findings of research-based knowledge within the context of a broad base of practical experience. While conducting research during the internship is not required, Interns are encouraged throughout the year to develop and to utilize their critical thinking skills, their knowledge of the scientific literature, and their ability to evaluate new research findings as a basis for clinical interventions. These are encouraged through such means as case assignments, individual and group supervision, mentoring and modeling, training seminars, internal and external rotations, in-service training, formal and informal consultation, attendance at professional conferences and workshops, and assigned readings.

The Practitioner-Scholar model as conceptualized by the training staff of the USF Counseling Center is consistent with the mutuality of science and practice as discussed by Hoshmand and Polinghorne (1992). They state that psychological science as a human practice and psychological practice as a human science inform each other and emphasize the importance of the development of reflective skills in the practice of psychology. These processes are fostered and strongly encouraged in the Counseling Center through supervision, modeling, teaching, and mentoring which seek to integrate the scientific and practice functions of the professional in training. As Hoshmand and Polinghorne propose, practice is ... the locale for knowledge development through practical reasoning processes and for the pragmatic test of knowledge claims. An expert practitioner constantly evaluates the fit of scientific knowledge to the requirements of practice. Through trial and error, construct systems are modified as a new understanding produces better results than the old.

Dreyfus and Dreyfus (1986) described five stages in the acquisition of the knowledge of practice. In the first (or novice) stage the source of knowledge is primarily external to the practitioner, and practice consists of applying the rules and procedures derived from academic training. In the fifth (or expert) stage, the source of knowledge is foremost the practitioners experience, and practice involves accommodating previous understanding to the uniqueness of a particular clinical situation. Expert knowledge is a dynamic and contextualized understanding that is the result of the interaction of cognitive patterns or meaning gestalts with environmental cues. Mental designs are revised and adjusted in the light of professional experiences and reflective thought. Forrest-Pressley, McKinnon, & Waller (1985) stated that when we reflect, we change from thinking with our patterns to meta-cognitive awareness. We focus on the possibility that the situation may not fit any pattern of understanding in our repertoire or that we have tried to make the situation conform to a pattern with which we are comfortable.

Hoshmand and Polinghorne (1992) conclude that professional education should be focused on the development of reflective judgment of the type conceived in expert practice. They state that the purpose of developing skillful reflection is to enhance the capacity of deliberative control over the biases that hamper full understanding and lessen practitioners effectiveness in the context of practice. Professional wisdom should include the ability to evaluate and critique ones own understanding and actions. The National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner Education and Training for the Professional Practice of Psychology (Belar and Perry, 1992) concluded that education and training in either research or practice alone, or concurrently without integration, were viewed as not fulfilling the requirements for implementation of this model. In a conference policy statement, it was concluded that training in research prepares the scientist-practitioner for distinguishing fact from opinion in applications of the science of behavior and for innovation in existing theory and techniques. Conference recommendations included the following: (1) The process of critical thinking, hypothesis testing and other elements of the scientific method should be engendered and integrated into all experiential activities throughout the training process, (2) The experiential component of practice should be broad and general rather than narrow and specific, (3) The experiential component should include several different levels of experiences across a broad variety of settings and populations.

Stricker and Trierweiler (1995) describe the local clinical scientist as one who operates as an active scientist, not simply as an applied scientist, and approaching each clinical interaction as a problem to be solved, much as the scientist approaches problems in the laboratory...each clinical exchange takes place in a metaphoric scientific laboratory... the clinician must draw on the corpus of scientific psychological knowledge and apply it as relevant and appropriate.

The psychology training staff at the USF Counseling Center for Human Development fully endorses the practitioner-scholar model of training and strives to develop and review all policies and procedures pertinent to the pre-doctoral internship program in professional psychology within this context.

References

Belar, C.D. & Perry, N.W. (1992). The National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner Education and Training for the Professional Practice of Psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.

Dreyfus, H.L., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.

Forrest-Pressley, D., McKinnon, G., & Waller, T. (1985). Meta-cognition, cognition , and human performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Hoshmand, L.T., & Polkinghorne, D.E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55-66.

Stricker, G. & Trierweiler, S.J. (1995). The local clinical scientist: A bridge between science and practice. American Psychologist, 50, 995-1002.

 

 

   
 
   
  back to top    
 
Search the USF Web site USF site map USF home page